Interview with Barbra Allen Bradshaw and Carol Loffelmann

This week I had the pleasure of interviewing the co-founders of the Canadian Clinicians for Therapeutic Nutrition and a low-carb female physician facebook group with over 3000 members.  Barb and Carol are both practicing physicians. Carol is an anesthetist in Toronto and Barb is a pathologist in Abbotsford. Individually, they developed an appreciation for the impact dietary choices had on their own health and weight.  About three years ago, they met online and have been collaborating to support Canadian physicians who are interested in lower carb, whole food eating for themselves and for patients.  

Carol and Barb have also become involved in food policy advocacy.  They worked hard to be heard about the recent Canadian Food Guide changes; organizing petitions, and even traveling to Ottawa to meet with Health Canada.  What they were advocating is for a food guide based on where the evidence truly is currently.  Is there enough evidence to say everyone should be eating low carb? Probably not.  Is there enough evidence to support the current guidelines that everyone should avoid saturated fat? Probably not either.

Making population based recommendations is a big deal.  There are many different types of bodies out there.  People have a range of metabolic health.  Barb and Carol were asking for the food guide to base any population based recommendations on good quality evidence, not consensus opinion.  They advocate a whole foods, lower sugar approach.  How did it go? Have a listen to the podcast episode to hear their experiences.

What if the 1980’s food guide hadn’t happened?

My conversation with Carol and Barb led me to reflect on my memories of the food guide.  I remember when eggs suddenly became “bad” because of cholesterol (As a child, this was a good thing in my life as I LOATHED eggs) and we switched to eating cereal or toast for breakfast.  In elementary school, when the food guide came out recommending 5-12 servings of grains per day, I thought, “Great! All this homemade bread I’m eating is healthy.  It’s low fat. I just need to eat more of it.”  Snacks were solidly in the grain/starch category with bread or crackers or sugar sweetened yogurt. As long as something was low fat, it was considered healthy and got a thumbs up.

I think my parents really tried to eat healthy as a family. Most of what we ate was homemade. We rarely ate out. Pop and chips only entered the house at Christmas time. We always ate dinner as a family. They did their best to follow the food guidelines.

So how did this work for us?  Not well.  All of us ended up overweight and struggling with obesity. I used to think that it was just genetics. It was how my family’s bodies were.  We were doomed to always have a weight issue.

Looking back now, I do wonder how it would have been different.  What if we had been left alone to continue eating a fairly balanced diet of whole foods?  What if all our school snack foods hadn’t been amped full of sugar and marketed as “healthy”? I suspect we may still have had some weight issues as a family.  But I truly don’t think it would have been to the same progressive level that we all experienced.

Moving forward…

Following the food guide wasn’t the right approach for our particular family. Eating with a lower carb approach has worked much better for us. I’m not saying that low carb is the right answer for every person. Just like low fat was not the right answer either.  I think people should be supported in finding a whole food way of eating that works for their body and their life. This will look different for different people. Government guidelines should reflect the variation in the population and the uncertainties of the current evidence.

 

 

Were you in the “Snackwells Generation” too? I can help you learn new habits and tools.

 
My weight loss coaching for physicians is private, evidence based, and comprehensive to address all aspects of your weight concerns.
Book a free introductory session and lets get to work!